Discrimination Against Obese People Health And Social Care Essay

dis homogeneousity against orotund People Health And Social C be judge corpulency disagreement has a great impact on wellness c are. The healthcare may be more(prenominal) critical of grave individuals. close to primary care physicians may be less attentive to treating fleshiness than other ailments as well. Overweight individuals seem to pick up on the negative feelings studies show corpulent individuals tend to delay going to the mend even for rtabooine visits. There is no exception for radiographer the impact of corpulency. To better the image quality a certain amount of shaft of light is inevitable to go through the body in pear-shaped patient. And that is higher than typical doses of radiation in order to obtain X-ray images. Also obesity has impact on the surgical options for obese patients, the anatomy and imaging of gastric bypass surgery, and how to recognize and treat surgical complications of bariatric surgery. Obese patients need to leverage larger wheelc hairs, larger beds and even larger diagnostic imaging machines.1b.Reading the telescope of fleshiness, and how deal are becoming Obese, will help me to gain a close understand of how obese stack feeling somewhat themselves and how variation effects obese people. It will help me to see the obese people as an ailment not blame them because of their weight. As a skiagraphy student I should deal with all patients equally. If those issues above has impact on health care provider, it is also has mental impact on obese patient.2a. In this annotated bibliography I would like to convey to the reader, that obesity al focussings is not individual fault, at that place may be other factor much(prenominal) as medical condition and disease which make people obese. By discrimination obese people we may vagabond their self-esteem and sociable interaction down. I would also like to convey to the reader how I view as re appeared my chosen topic, how I changed my bet each time to develop the appropriate binds required.2b.The title for my Annotated Bibliography would be Stigma and discrimination against obese people.3a. The first appear I carried away was a Google seem. I carried bulge a unlike search using Google Scholar online to scratch diary articles for critiquing. I used Birmingham City University web site. From the main library website, I clicked on electronic resources A to Z. CINAHL plus with Full Text and MEDLINE was my infobases to find a peer reviewed articles.3b. First I was looking to a Google search to have a background reading of my topic. So I put obesity in search box and I had About 39,500,000 results. and so I modified my search by adding obesity and discrimination, I got just about 4,570,000 results and from there I had my germane(predicate) titles. Again I modified my search again by entering additional search terms in Radiology, which I gotAbout 1,650,000 results and I had deuce of my supporting sources from there. wherefore I searc hed in Google Scholar I Put obesity and dissimilitude from 2000 to 2011and from there I find two articles of my key sources. I carried out a different search using Google Scholar online to find daybook articles for critiquing. Then I went to Birmingham city university website and I clicked on electronic resources A to Z.I start with Cinhal plus with full text. I logged in and in search box put obesity as a key word, so I ticked the full text and peer review to find my articles. These are strong sources because they are peer reviewed articles. Then I clicked search, I had 4515 results. In first result I found one of my supporting sources. Again I modified my search by adding discrimination on search box. And I got 2483 results. I linked them with and, so I got 38 results. From there I got triple key sources which I will critique them and it is pertinent to my topic. To find more articles I changed my databases to Medline and I did same steps for my articles. When I liked obesit y and discrimination with and, I had 279 results. Again I had two key sources and one supporting sources for my assignment. I chose which articles were most useful by looking at the date they were published and whether the information contained is still relevant to todays situation. I also tried to find sources from a variety of locations moreover found some unhelpful. And I ended my search.4a.Two articles critiquingDevelopment and psychometric Testing of the Nurses Attitudes Towards Obesity and Obese Patients (NATOOPS) ScaleLorraine Watson, Kathleen Oberle, Danielle Deutscherenquiry in breast feeding and Health, 2008, 31, 586 593Being fat in todays world a qualitative line of business of the lived experiences of people with obesity in Australia.Samantha L. Thomas PhD, Jim Hyde PhD, Asuntha Karunaratne BMedSci (Hons), Dilinie Herbert MBioMedSci (Part 1) and Paul A. Komesaroff MB BS FRACP PhD2008 The Authors, Journal Compilation, 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Health Expectations, 11, pp. 321 330IntroductionThe above two articles are of two studies to look into the obesity stigmatisation in two different aspects. In the first article, the attitudes of the health care professionals, and on this occasion nurses, towards obese individuals have been studied using psychometric analysis. The second article is about a education designed to look into how obese individuals feel in themselves about public perception and discrimination based upon their body weight, which is more like looking into the original side of the argument and that is to find out when, how and why such stigmatisation has developed.CritiqueThere is no surmise that obesity stigma does exist just like other forms of discrimination in the parliamentary law based upon race, ethnic origin and having an underlying illness such as HIV. The authors of the first article have started well by talking about the basic principles and reviewing a lot of literatures about similar preceding(prenominal) studie s with regards to health care professionals attitudes towards their obese patients.The method was good with a considerable number of professional nurses fall aparticipated in it and, in my opinion, the NATOOPS did cover the psychological aspects of nurse-patient relationship. The results were identical to most of the previous studies and the study simply actualiseed the previous ideology that negative attitudes towards obese individuals even among health care professionals do exist.However, when there is a problem there must be a solution, and whilst the authors have nicely highlighted and confirmed this problem amongst nurses, they have failed to provide answers and actor to change such attitudes. They have given a lot of flesh out in identifying the problem, hardly have only briefly towards the end suggested how to encounter the issue and how to educate our nurses not to stigmatise based upon body weight. In my opinion, they should have made more suggestions to rectify proble matic attitudes and behaviours.The second article is covering the other side of the argument in other words, peoples substantive flavor experience to make a case that obesity stigmatisation does exist. It is a good qualitative study with a clever way to attract random obese individuals to participate through newspaper advertisement.The method, data collection and the data analysis was pretty good. The number of participants was satisfactory, though could have been higher. The quotes from the individuals were prime examples of how this section of society is victimised in different aspects of life including employment, education, health care and general public services such as transport. They describe a clear blame culture by professionals, insurance makers and media.It is worth mentioning the fact that the opt-in record of this study makes it biased towards the participants. Those chose to take part and to be interviewed for the study were generally the ones with bad experience. P ersonally, I feel that random selection would have been much better to reflect the true nature of how obese people in the community feel about themselves and how society treats them.ConclusionTo sum it up, there is no question that society treats obese individuals unfairly and there are quite a few studies to confirm this fact. Health care professionals such as nurses are no exception, but we need to find ways to educate them and to change this mentality in order to improve the quality of health care given to everyone without discrimination. The qualitative study of the obese peoples real life experience is a good one but there is a self-selection bias within the warning as admitted by the authors themselves. More random and bigger studies are necessitate in this field I believe.5a.and 5bKey SourcesBrownell, K. D .and, Puhl,R.(2003), Stigma and Discrimination in Weight Management and Obesity, The Permanente Journal, Vol 7, none 3, online getable from http//xnet.kp.org/permanente journal/sum03/stigma.pdf,Accessed 17/03/2011It covers the three common areas of weight-based discrimination which are education, health care and employment.Puhl, R. and Brownell, K. D. (2001), Bias, Discrimination and Obesity, Obesity Research, Vol 9, No. 12, online Available from http//www.nature.com/oby/journal/v9/n12/full/oby2001108a.html?referer=www.clickfind.com.au,Accessed 26/02/2011Puhl, R. M and Chelsea Heuer, A. (2010), Obesity Stigma Important considerations for public health, American Journal of domain Health, Vol 100, No. 6, June 2010 online Available fromhttp//www.yaleruddcenter.org/resources/upload/docs/what/bias/ObesityStigmaPublicHealth_AJPH_6.10.pdf, Accessed 16/02/2011This article gives particular anxiety to the health issues surrounding obese individuals and they compared their public discrimination to similar socially disregarded group such as HIV patients as in this article.Thomas, S. L. Hyde, J. Karunaratne, A. Herbert, D. and Komesaroff, P. A. (2008), Being fat in todays world a qualitative study of the lived experiences of people with obesity in Australia, Journal Compilation, 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Health Expectations, 11, pp. 321 330 online useable fromhttp//web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=11hid=105sid=da2c22ec-6030-42bb-b61d-59f07cc7ed8d%40sessionmgr114,Accessed 22/03/2011Watson, L. Oberle, K. and Deutscher, D.(2008), Development and Psychometric Testing of the Nurses Attitudes Towards Obesity and Obese Patients (NATOOPS) Scale, Research in Nursing and Health, 2008, 31, 586 593 ,online Available fromhttp//web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=11hid=105sid=da2c22ec-6030-42bb-b61d-59f07cc7ed8d%40sessionmgr114Accessed 25/03/2011Supporting SourcesHunte, H.E, and Williams, D.R.(2009),American Journal of Public Health, The Association Between Perceived Discrimination and Obesity in a Population-Based Multiracial and Multiethnic Adult Sample, Vol 99, No. 7,online Available from http//web.ebscohost.com/eh ost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=11hid=105sid=da2c22ec-6030-42bb-b61d-59f07cc7ed8d%40sessionmgr114, Accessed 26/03/2011This is more like a research study, and it mainly focuses on the psychological variant caused by discrimination based upon race, ethnic origin and other factors confidential information to obesity, rather than the other way round.Reynolds A, (2011), Obesity and Medical Imaging Challenges, Radiologic Technology, Vol.82 (3) 219-42, online Available at http//web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=10hid=105sid=da2c22ec-6030-42bb-b61d-59f07cc7ed8d%40sessionmgr114,accessed 30/03/2011Yanch, J. C. , Behrman, R.H. , Hendricks, M.J. , McCall J. H. ,(2009), Increased Radiation Dose to Overweight and Obese Patients from Radiographic Examinations, online Available from http//radiology.rsna.org/content/252/1/128.full,Accessed 24/02/2011This article explains and compares radiation dose to obese patient in compare with normal patient.