Business Law Essay

Bai 1 Business Law40. Principle of Law In this case, Esposito hired Excel Construction Company to repair a porch roof. All terms of the agreement were specified in a written contract. And the dispute occurred when Excel had repaired the rear porch roof because in the agreement failed to specify whether it was the move or rear porch that needed repair. Under civil law, two parties here had write a civil contract in writing. Because the contract failed to specify understandably front or rear porch roof, Excel completed its obligation and didnt break the contract. close Esposito had to pay $62.5 to Excel41. Principle of Law The raft amidst the nephew and his uncle is an oral contract, therefore the nephews promise to avoid drinking, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards and billiards for money until he became 21 legal consideration. However, in order to feel the money, the nephew had to give the evidence of his bargain with his uncle, and his uncles acknowledgement that he pr acticed his part in the bargain.Decision The nephew needs to give evidence of his oral bargain with his uncle so that he can get the amount of $5,000.43. Principle of Law In this case, Grogan, a marketing consultant, was hired by Kreger Bottling Company to conduct market research into the taste preferences of consumers in a major city. This is his obligation in the labor contract between Grogan and Kreger. His additional task of analyzing the appeal of various shapes of bottles that Kreger was considering for a new line of soft drinks was not included in the contract. Therefore Grogan had the right of claim his bill from Kreger, and Kreger had to take a shit his bill for the taste test.Decision Kreger had to clear Grogans bill for the taste test.35. Principle of Law According to the bidding law, here Pote is the seller in bidding for Fletcher-Harlee Corp and has some obligations follows 1) pre-solicitation sales activities, 2) getting qualified, 3) reviewing the RFP in light of a ll available intelligence, 4) deciding to bid or not to bid, 5) being fully responsive to the proposal, 6) differentiating its offer from competitors, 7) accurately to estimate cost, and 8) effectively sell the job in the post-quote period. Therefore, Pote had to estimate all costs before submitting its written price quotation for concrete and its quotation was unable to be for informational purposes.Decision Potes bid didnt constitute a sound offer.36. Principle of Law The transaction between Browne and Houlihan was just under negotiation summons and not form the contract. Browne did not acknowledge Houlihans e-mail and did not reply to accept Houlihans request, so he sold the picture set to another. Houlihan then purchased a new set more expensive than Brownes set. Both of them didnt break the contract because theres no contract between them. Therefore Houlihan had no legal basis to sue Browne for $1,000.Decision Houlihan and Browne didnt have a valid contract, and Houlihan wi ll be unable to recover $1,000 from Browne.37. Principle of Law The contract is an agreement agreed among parties. If theres any changes related to the contract, all parties in the contract had to be informed and agree changes. However, in this case McGurn crossed out the number 12, replaced it with the number 24 without informing Bell about this and signed the contract. Bell didnt acknowledge the change that had been made to the contract. If theres any dispute raised from this contract, Bell can refuse its obligation with the rationalness that the contract is not valid. Actually, the fact that Bell didnt acknowledge the change cant happen because all parties in the contract has to check really carefully before performing the contract.Decision Bells silence as to McGurns counteroffer didnt amount to an acceptance.38. Principle of Law In this case, Sanderson market place promised to sell nose candy Electric Hand Drills with cheap price on Saturday only. Cruz arrived at the store with the time as advertisement but cant buy the Electric Drill because Sanderson just had 2 in stock and let them for 2 other customers. Its impossible for Sanderson to do that because according to the advertisement, 100 electric hand Drills are for the first 100 customers. Unless Sanderson was out of stock, it had to sell electric drill to Cruz.Decision Sanderson will be required to sell the electric drill for the advertised price.